Patel & Alumit, P.C., Patent & Trademark Attorneys

Intellectual Property Law
Helping Businesses and Entrepreneurs Nationwide

 

PatentsTrademarksCopyrightsDomain DisputesAbout Us

   
     
  Provisional Patents

 
  Patent Searches

 
  Foreign Patents

 
  Patent Basics

 
  Patent Faq's

 
  Inventors Handbook

 

Trademark Information
  Trademark Search/Registration  
  Copyright Application  

Trademark Research
 
Obtain a free consultation.  Simply fill out our online consultation form or call us at 818-380-1900

 

Trademark Attorneys






Home
: Patents: Inventors Handbook

Inventors Handbook

C. Assessing the Idea

Before investing a considerable amount of time, energy and money on an invention, potential inventors should consider two questions. First, can the invention be patented? This refers to whether or not an invention is eligible for patent protection. The second question is; should the invention be patented? This refers to whether or not an invention is worth patenting even if it can be patented.

I. Is Patenting Possible?

In order to obtain a patent, an invention must be novel (“new”), useful, and non-obvious. Any invention is novel as long as it has not been known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in any country before the date of invention. The invention must be different in some way from all other previously known inventions. Other novelty rules include the one-year prohibition on patenting inventions that were publicly used or on sale (as mentioned above).

The usefulness requirement can be satisfied as long as an invention serves some utilitarian function. This is a relatively easy standard to overcome, and even minor utility satisfies the requirement.
Finally, the invention must be non-obvious in light of other inventions in the Art. This means that the improvements sought to be patented cannot be improvements that would be obvious to someone of similar skill as the inventor seeking the patent.

II. Is Patenting Practical?

Even if an invention can be the subject of a patent, it may be impractical to patent the invention for one or more of the following reasons: It will be difficult to detect and deter infringers, the invention has little market value or will have a short lived market value, the goal of the invention can be accomplished in a variety of ways, or in situations where the invention is best preserved as a trade secret.

III. Research: The Idea and the Market

In order to assess the question of whether a patent application should be filed, it is important to research other inventions in the Art (the field of the invention) and the commercial viability of an improvement in the marketplace. This assessment should include the following:

Potential Customers: Prospective customers who might use the invention can provide resourceful insights, critical analysis and feedback on existing similar products as well as suggestions for improvements.

Competing Products: Existing products in the Art can be a valuable resource for predicting the success of an invention. In particular, the respective advantages and disadvantages of products already on the market; and how they compare with each other can yield valuable information.

The Market: If the market is very small, or of a limited duration, it may be advisable not to file a patent. Patent applications typically take between two and three years to issue, and in very small markets, the nature of the competition may not warrant the expense of obtaining a patent. It may be advisable to visit trade groups or industry meetings such as trade shows to see recent developments in the art and the market.

Market research firms specialize in researching potential products, and may be a useful source of information. These firms can be useful in determining the potential competition your product will face, demographics for customers, and financial information regarding the economic feasibility of the invention.

Logistic Problems: If the invention can easily be reproduced by others, and in particular, if it will be difficult to detect or deter infringers, it may not be advisable to seek patent protection. If the invention fails to provide a competitive advantage, such as offering a cheaper or better alternative to inventions known in the art, a patent may be inadvisable. If there are multiple inventors who have not assigned their rights in the invention, they will have the right to practice the invention should a patent issue, diluting the patent rights. Finally, if filing a patent on an invention will necessarily involve the disclosure of trade secrets – since patents are public documents – it may be inadvisable to file an application.

< Previous PageNext Page>



 

Our Firm's Recent Patents:

U.S. Pat No. 7,874,096 -
Fish releasing device

   
App No. 20110034114 -
Vibration-Free Machining of Pilgrim Mandrels
   
App No. 20110012348 -
Hightly - Tight Threaded Joint
   
U.S. Pat No. 20110011858 -
Paint Clean-up Container
   
U.S. Pat No. 20100320732 -
Shopping Cart Designed For Vehicle Trunks
   
U.S. Pat No. 20100306974 -
Safety Double Connector
   
U.S. Pat No. 7,385,514 -
Bio-feedback walker device
   
U.S. Pat No. 7,347,474 -
Truck bed extension
   

U.S. Pat No. 7,341,143 -
Storage device for disk media

 

TERMS OF USE
| PRIVACY POLICY | RESOURCES | DISCLAIMER

16830 Ventura Blvd., Suite 360, Encino, CA 91436

Copyright © 1999-2012 Patel & Almeida, P.C., All Rights Reserved